US Senate May Drop Public Healthcare Option
Filed at 12:28 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers on both sides of the U.S. Capitol struggled to reach a healthcare deal on Tuesday, with Senate Democrats near agreement with three Republicans on a plan that would not include a government-run insurance option backed by President Barack Obama.
After more than six hours of closed-door meetings, however, Democrats in the House of Representatives said they had not reached a deal with rebellious fiscal conservatives and it was unlikely they would vote on a healthcare overhaul before heading home for their August recess at the end of the week.
House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer said there would not be a vote on Friday and there was a "pretty slim" chance lawmakers would be held for a vote on Saturday. "We're trying not to foreclose our options," he told reporters.
Obama has pushed for a measure that will rein in healthcare costs, improve care and cover most of the 46 million uninsured Americans, making it his top legislative priority.
Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee said they were close to success in bipartisan negotiations with three panel Republicans -- even if the full group does not take up the bill before the break starts on August 7.
"Whether we get through markup or not I can't tell you today. But I am confident we'll have a concept we'll agree on," Senator John Kerry, a Democratic member of the panel, told reporters.
NON-PROFITS AND TAXES
The Senate Finance negotiations have zeroed in on a plan that would use non-profit cooperatives to compete with private insurers to drive down costs, members say, not the public plan favoured by Obama and many Democrats.
The panel also is likely to back a tax on high-cost insurance policies to try to raise revenue and keep costs down.
The White House said it would wait until it sees the bill to comment on the cooperative approach, which is certain to disappoint some Democrats even if it wins over the three Republicans involved in the negotiations.
"I have done a lot of reading on the history of co-ops and it is not a nice history," Senator John Rockefeller told reporters after a closed-door meeting of Democrats.
Democratic Senator Kent Conrad said the approach would use non-profit associations at a state, regional and national level and could attract some 12 million people.
He said the U.S. government could provide about $6 billion in start-up money to help healthcare cooperatives meet reserve requirements. Any co-op would need about 25,000 members to be financially viable and about 500,000 members to negotiate competitive rates with providers, he said.
Shares of U.S. health insurers rose broadly on Tuesday on hopes a health reform bill would not include a government-run option, which has drawn strong opposition from insurers who fear it would destroy the private marketplace.
The S&P Managed Health Care index of large U.S. health insurers closed 6.5 percent higher.
Aetna rose 12.6 percent, Coventry was up 12.7 percent and Cigna was 7.7 percent higher, all on the New York Stock Exchange. Centene rose 7.9 percent.
NO BLUE DOG DEAL
Obama's drive for a broad overhaul of the healthcare industry has been stalled in the Senate and House of Representatives, both controlled by his fellow Democrats. It has been hit by a deluge of criticism over the cost, scope and funding of the more than $1 trillion (600 billion pounds) measure.
Republicans in both chambers have slammed the plans as an expensive first step to a government takeover of healthcare. No Republican has come out in favour of any of the plans so far, although the three Senate Republicans have worked with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus to find agreement.
An August deadline to approve initial versions of the bill is dead in the Senate and on life support in the House, where conservative Democrats known as "Blue Dogs" have held up a vote in the Energy and Commerce Committee over cost concerns.
Members of the group met with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Energy Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel for several hours on Tuesday afternoon and again Tuesday night.
Representative Mike Ross, a leader of the group, said there were still 12 issues of disagreement. "It might be impossible to come to a resolution on some of them," he told reporters.
"We continue to talk," he said as the final meeting broke up. Talks will resume in the morning. "I'd like to think we're making progress," Ross said.
Obama, who over the past week has lobbied hard for the overhaul plan, said there was no time to lose.
"The costs of doing nothing are trillions of dollars in costs over the next couple of decades -- trillions, not billions," Obama told a town hall meeting conducted by AARP, a lobbying group for seniors.
"I understand people being scared that this is going to be way too costly," he said. "It's not too costly if we start making changes right now."
(Additional reporting by David Alexander, Rick Cowan and Jackie Frank; Editing by John O'Callaghan and Eric Beech)
Filed at 12:28 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers on both sides of the U.S. Capitol struggled to reach a healthcare deal on Tuesday, with Senate Democrats near agreement with three Republicans on a plan that would not include a government-run insurance option backed by President Barack Obama.
After more than six hours of closed-door meetings, however, Democrats in the House of Representatives said they had not reached a deal with rebellious fiscal conservatives and it was unlikely they would vote on a healthcare overhaul before heading home for their August recess at the end of the week.
House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer said there would not be a vote on Friday and there was a "pretty slim" chance lawmakers would be held for a vote on Saturday. "We're trying not to foreclose our options," he told reporters.
Obama has pushed for a measure that will rein in healthcare costs, improve care and cover most of the 46 million uninsured Americans, making it his top legislative priority.
Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee said they were close to success in bipartisan negotiations with three panel Republicans -- even if the full group does not take up the bill before the break starts on August 7.
"Whether we get through markup or not I can't tell you today. But I am confident we'll have a concept we'll agree on," Senator John Kerry, a Democratic member of the panel, told reporters.
NON-PROFITS AND TAXES
The Senate Finance negotiations have zeroed in on a plan that would use non-profit cooperatives to compete with private insurers to drive down costs, members say, not the public plan favoured by Obama and many Democrats.
The panel also is likely to back a tax on high-cost insurance policies to try to raise revenue and keep costs down.
The White House said it would wait until it sees the bill to comment on the cooperative approach, which is certain to disappoint some Democrats even if it wins over the three Republicans involved in the negotiations.
"I have done a lot of reading on the history of co-ops and it is not a nice history," Senator John Rockefeller told reporters after a closed-door meeting of Democrats.
Democratic Senator Kent Conrad said the approach would use non-profit associations at a state, regional and national level and could attract some 12 million people.
He said the U.S. government could provide about $6 billion in start-up money to help healthcare cooperatives meet reserve requirements. Any co-op would need about 25,000 members to be financially viable and about 500,000 members to negotiate competitive rates with providers, he said.
Shares of U.S. health insurers rose broadly on Tuesday on hopes a health reform bill would not include a government-run option, which has drawn strong opposition from insurers who fear it would destroy the private marketplace.
The S&P Managed Health Care index of large U.S. health insurers closed 6.5 percent higher.
Aetna rose 12.6 percent, Coventry was up 12.7 percent and Cigna was 7.7 percent higher, all on the New York Stock Exchange. Centene rose 7.9 percent.
NO BLUE DOG DEAL
Obama's drive for a broad overhaul of the healthcare industry has been stalled in the Senate and House of Representatives, both controlled by his fellow Democrats. It has been hit by a deluge of criticism over the cost, scope and funding of the more than $1 trillion (600 billion pounds) measure.
Republicans in both chambers have slammed the plans as an expensive first step to a government takeover of healthcare. No Republican has come out in favour of any of the plans so far, although the three Senate Republicans have worked with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus to find agreement.
An August deadline to approve initial versions of the bill is dead in the Senate and on life support in the House, where conservative Democrats known as "Blue Dogs" have held up a vote in the Energy and Commerce Committee over cost concerns.
Members of the group met with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Energy Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel for several hours on Tuesday afternoon and again Tuesday night.
Representative Mike Ross, a leader of the group, said there were still 12 issues of disagreement. "It might be impossible to come to a resolution on some of them," he told reporters.
"We continue to talk," he said as the final meeting broke up. Talks will resume in the morning. "I'd like to think we're making progress," Ross said.
Obama, who over the past week has lobbied hard for the overhaul plan, said there was no time to lose.
"The costs of doing nothing are trillions of dollars in costs over the next couple of decades -- trillions, not billions," Obama told a town hall meeting conducted by AARP, a lobbying group for seniors.
"I understand people being scared that this is going to be way too costly," he said. "It's not too costly if we start making changes right now."
(Additional reporting by David Alexander, Rick Cowan and Jackie Frank; Editing by John O'Callaghan and Eric Beech)
Source: New York Times
« Back to US News
Related News
-
US Senate healthcare bill includes public option Jul 28, 2009 @ 01:00 AM
WASHINGTON, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Democratic leader Harry Reidsaid on Monday the U.S. Senate's healthcare overhaul willinclude a government-run insurance plan that lets states optout, handing liberals an early victory on the bill's mostcontentious issue.
-
WRAPUP 1-us Senate healthcare bill includes public option Jul 28, 2009 @ 01:00 AM
WASHINGTON, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Democratic leader Harry Reidsaid on Monday the U.S. Senate's healthcare overhaul willinclude a government-run insurance plan that lets states optout, handing liberals an early victory on the bill's mostcontentious issue.
-
Obama hits back at insurers over health reform Jul 28, 2009 @ 01:00 AM
NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama hit back at the health insurance industry on Thursday, accusing it of trying to deceive Americans about healthcare reform and vowing to overhaul the industry in Congress.
-
Obama aides leave room for healthcare compromise Jul 28, 2009 @ 01:00 AM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama's top aides said on Sunday he still wants a government insurance option in healthcare legislation but they left room for a compromise that could disappoint his liberal backers.
-
House panel OKs healthcare bill, setting stage for fall vote Jul 28, 2009 @ 01:00 AM
Reporting from Washington -- President Obama's ambitious plan to overhaul the nation's healthcare system got a major boost when a pivotal House committee passed a compromise bill Friday night, clearing the way for a floor vote this fall.The bill was approved 31 to 28, with five Democrats and all of the Republicans on the energy and commerce committee voting against it. Despite the defections, enough liberal and conservative Democrats were able to come together to break the deadlock that had stalled the bill for weeks. "We are a diverse caucus with many points of view," said committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Beverly Hills). "We've agreed we need to pull together."To reach agreement, Waxman earlier this week had accepted conservative lawmakers' demands to limit the bill's price tag to $1 trillion over 10 years, exempt more small businesses from the employer-provided insurance mandate, and reduce the number of low-income people who would qualify for subsidized coverage.But those changes provoked a backlash among liberals. To win them back, Waxman crafted a compromise that would restore low-income subsidies. The committee also added a major provision that would limit the premium increases that insurers could impose, and another that would let the government negotiate pharmaceutical prices under Medicare's prescription drug program -- a goal long sought by liberals as a way to reduce drug costs. (The idea was bitterly opposed by Republicans when the program was established in 2003, as critics questioned whether the government would secure discounts.) The bill is designed to provide insurance for the 46 million people in the U.S. who now go without it; to curb healthcare costs; and to make it harder for companies to deny coverage or increase premiums."We have a historic opportunity to transform our healthcare system," Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), a leader of the panel's conservative faction, said ahead of the vote. But Republicans said that despite changes made to address conservative Democrats' concerns, the legislation remained a costly, intrusive expansion of government power over medical care. Conservatives did little more than "pick the color of the lipstick on this pig," said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.).The vote came just as House members prepared to leave town for a monthlong recess.Now Democratic leaders are asking lawmakers to fan out around the country to help Obama sell the plan. They will, among other things, try to counter efforts to portray the bill as a government takeover of medicine and to convince middle-class people that the plan would benefit those who already have insurance.Every House member was given a card summarizing details of the $1-trillion bill -- including new insurance subsidies for the poor, tax credits for small businesses that provide coverage for their workers, and expanded prescription drug coverage for the elderly.The legislation also would broaden Medicaid, the federal-state healthcare program, to cover more low-income people. Middle-class workers would receive new subsidies to pay health insurance premiums. And government-sponsored insurance would be available as an alternative to private plans. "The president of the United States will be out front as the drum major," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco). "We will be the drumbeat across America."White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that the House committee action was a "big, positive step forward, and gets us even closer to comprehensive healthcare reform."A key part of the Democrats' strategy, worked out in coordination with the White House, will be to demonize insurance companies for opposing a bill that has been backed by an array of health and consumer groups. Pelosi predicted the industry would conduct a "shock and awe" campaign in the coming weeks to block the bill.Said Gibbs: "I think many people that believe we need comprehensive healthcare reform think that insurance companies have not lived up to all of their responsibilities -- and that they can do better."Critics worry that the federally run insurance option would undermine private insurers through cut-rate premiums, putting the health system on a path to being dominated by the government. Republicans on the House panel offered an amendment to drop the public option, but the committee rejected it.Before approving the bill, however, lawmakers defied Waxman and delivered a major victory for the drug industry by voting to give 12 years of market protection to companies that offer advanced new drugs to combat major diseases like cancer and Parkinson's. Opponents, including the White House, had sought to make generic versions of such drugs available to the public sooner.The Democrats who opposed the final bill were Reps. John Barrow of Georgia, Rick Boucher of Virginia, Jim Matheson of Utah, Charlie Melancon of Louisiana and Bart Stupak of Michigan.Energy and commerce is the third and final House committee to have a hand in shaping the healthcare legislation before it goes to the full House. Versions approved by other panels have included a surtax on wealthy people to help pay for the program, and a requirement that most employers provide health insurance for their workers.Obama had called for action on a healthcare overhaul before the August recess, but Congress is moving more slowly. In the Senate, a key committee has not reached agreement on its version of the bill.Still, Friday's House committee vote gives a much-needed shot of momentum to the legislation.During the August recess, House Democratic leaders will tackle the politically tricky task of blending the three committees' versions of the legislation. Unable to count on many Republican votes, leaders will have to produce a bill that commands broad Democratic support, balancing the concerns of conservatives who think the bill costs too much and liberals who think it does not go far enough.Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) had offered an amendment that would replace the committee's plan with a more comprehensive government health program known as a "single payer" plan -- an alternative modeled after systems like those in Canada and Britain that is strongly supported by liberal activists. Weiner withdrew the amendment after Democratic leaders promised that his measure would be brought before the full House for a vote.janet.hook@latimes.comNoam N. Levey in the Washington Bureau contributed to this report.
