Navigation


RSS: Latest News Feed



Is there a history lesson from the swine flu of '76?

Nov 28, 2009 @ 08:15 PM, Health, David Brown

Text Size: Make Text Size Smaller Make Text Size Bigger Reset
Email Friend
Print
Digg
Delicious
MySpace
Facebook
Twitter
Favorites
StumbleUpon

Google
Live

In October 1976, President Gerald Ford was one of 43 million Americans to receive a vaccine for swine flu. (Charles Tasnadi/associated Press)
In October 1976, President Gerald Ford was one of 43 million Americans to receive a vaccine for swine flu. (Charles Tasnadi/associated Press)
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.

As more and more people receive the H1N1 shot, an earlier vaccine is casting a mysterious shadow over the attempt to immunize 200 million people in the next few months.

A vaccine made in 1976 in response to a different strain of H1N1 influenza led to an outbreak of a rare form of paralysis. Of the 43 million people who were vaccinated, about 400 developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and 25 died.

Whether an equally unexpected surprise might be lurking in this year's swine flu shot is a big -- although not publicly acknowledged -- question hanging over the current immunization effort. That possibility is why the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention routinely reports, as it did Wednesday, on whether any notable side effects to the new vaccine have been discovered. (None have.)

Unlike today's bug, the 1976 virus never took off from where it originated at an army base in New Jersey. With nothing to be gained from vaccination, the widespread campaign was halted after less than three months.

For the 15 years after the "swine flu affair," scientists sought to nail down whether and how much the 1976 vaccine increased a person's risk of GBS. Almost nothing, however, was done to figure out how and why the flu shot had that effect. It's an oversight some public health officials are coming to regret.

"We should have made an exhaustive attempt to understand what happened from a biological standpoint," said Michael T. Osterholm, a physician who heads the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.

Both the 1976 strain and the new H1N1 strain are closely related to viruses carried by pigs, making some wonder whether that "swinishness" makes their vaccines more likely to cause unusual effects.

"That is the right question to ask," said Peter Palese, an influenza virologist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. "And I would like to say that no one really knows."

Researchers stopped looking back at 1976, Osterholm said, when there were no subsequent problems with flu vaccines. "After we had a couple of seasons under our belt when there was no unusual risk to regular flu vaccines, we just let it go," he said.

Today's H1N1 vaccine is made, tested and administered the same way the seasonal flu vaccine is. There's no reason to think it's any more dangerous than the regular flu shot, whose risk of serious side effects is essentially zero.

But that was true of the 1976 vaccine, too.

A spike in cases?

Named after two French physicians who described it in 1916, Guillain-Barré [GEE-yan bah-RAY] syndrome causes weakness and tingling that starts in the legs, but over weeks can affect most of the body's muscles. The symptoms occur because the insulation on the outside of nerve fibers breaks down, damaging the normal conduction of impulses.

Source: Washington Post


Bookmark and Share
« Back to Health News

Related News

  • US government faces no-win fight with flu Nov 28, 2009 @ 08:15 PM

    US_government_faces_nowin_fight_with_flu_1

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - First came the jibes about the U.S. government rushing out an untested swine flu vaccine. Now, critics say it is not fast enough.


  • U.S. government faces no-win fight with flu Nov 28, 2009 @ 08:15 PM

    US_government_faces_nowin_fight_with_flu_1

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - First came the jibes about the U.S. government rushing out an untested swine flu vaccine. Now, critics say it is not fast enough.


  • Flu pandemic could be mild Nov 28, 2009 @ 08:15 PM

    Yadira_Ramirez_holds_her_daughter_Amanda_Ramirez_2_at_an_H1N1_vaccination_clinic_at_in_Dallas_Swine_flu_rates_declined_for_the_fifth_straight_week_according_to_the_US_Centers_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention_Matt_Nagerbloomberg_News

    With the second wave of H1N1 infections having crested in the United States, leading epidemiologists are predicting that the pandemic could end up ranking as the mildest since modern medicine began documenting influenza outbreaks.


  • Swine flu 6 months later: Relief, but winter looms Nov 28, 2009 @ 08:15 PM

    FILE_In_this_Oct_5_2009_file_photo_Dr_Aaron_Kalinowski_receives_a_dose_of_the_swine_flu_vaccine_in_the_Occupational_Health_Clinic_at_Wishard_Memorial_Hospital_in_Indianapolis_It_was_six_months_ago_that_scientists_identified_an_ominous_brand_new_flu_virus___a_mysterious_amalgam_mostly_of_swine_flu_genes_mixed_with_human_and_bird_flu_bits_too_The_discovery_set_off_a_global_spasm_as_the_world_lurched_into_action_to_fight_the_flu_pandemic_experts_had_warned_of_for_years_AP_PhotoDarron_Cummings_File

    ATLANTA — It was six months ago that scientists discovered an ominous new flu virus, touching off fears of a catastrophic global outbreak that could cause people to drop dead in the streets. Doomsday, of course, never came to pass.


  • About the Swine Flu Vaccine Nov 28, 2009 @ 08:15 PM

    Andrew Pekosz, an associate professor of molecular microbiology and immunology at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, answers some questions about the H1N1 vaccine.